Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 08:59

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Delete Every App On Your Smartphone That’s On This List - Forbes
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump’s 50% steel tariffs are coming for your next fridge and dishwasher - CNN
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Lies of P DLC expansion ‘Overture’ now available - Gematsu
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Consequuntur dolor explicabo ipsa autem vel eos et.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
iOS 26 Could Bring Sleep Detection, Camera Controls, and New Gestures to AirPods - MacRumors